Видео

This video was tremendous, please do the rest of the series, yes even Rocky 5 thank you!

Amazing analysis

My stepfather took me to see Rocky in the theatre when it first came out. What stood out to me as a kid was the raw eggs drinking scene. Stallone was a genius to come up with that great script. He definitely tapped into something universal. I wasn't so much a fan of the sequels. The character of Rocky is more interesting as a underdog.

I like the first Rocky, it’s alright by me but it’s definitely not a favourite of mine, Raging Bull on the other hand, that’s my favourite boxing movie! If you haven’t seen it man in my opinion it absolutely blows Rocky away.

written in two days, yeah?

This must have been amazing to watch in the big screen, and most importantly the focus ain't about boxing but a story of love and perseverence. A cult classic.

It's a deep, complex movie....I like your Opinion....makes sense.....Strange how after the movie, Peter & Dennis lost their friendship....I read Peter's autobiography, "don't Tell dad"....it's a good book, he talks about many cool, hippy things...you can check it out at any library, i did...

I just don’t get why it ended like that you know? Like. All that just to die out in the middle of nowhere. I did like you take on the movie being about freedom though. I watched it for what it was and didn’t really start piecing that together until after the fact

Great lecture man! You gave me something more to explore about the movie. Also i always thought there was something odd about the position Kubrick puts the viewer in... in a way wants you to be the testimony of this grotesque theatre that is the human experience... and wants you to think deeply about the the things that in real life we take for granted by now. "Why is prison exist?" i mean what's the foundation of that thing, is good or evil really a concept that exist in nature? or it's just chaos and we HAVE to come up with this ideas to live together? and what's the consequence of this mechanic way of living for the human being? is morality a conditioned process we create or is it innate in us?... I thinks Kubrick's films makes you wonder about those questions, things about US that we buried in some part of our brain to believe that we are not beast anymore, it's seems like we removed from our consciuos mind some terrifying truths about the animals we are, in order to APPEAR less animals and be okay with the voice inside us, that is capable to do the worst things imaginable and unimaginable. The film contains soo many information united but detached from one other... that is almost like a puzzle. And what the film does internally to the charachters, externally is also conditioning us.... we watch those images and sounds projected and we get mixed feelings about it, the film costantly changes our perspective on the action that is shown... we are influenced by the Eye of Kubrick that forced us to stand with Alex, even if we don't supposed to (?) is the government violence's more brutal than the violence of Alex?... or we re just getting fooled by magic tricks of Cinema? (the ultimate Conditioning tool, used by Nazims, Fascism to to propaganda about their ideology) is the music? the personality of Alex that puts us behind him despite the atrocity he does?. Soo many questions and mistery with Kubrick.

Both Catherine and Beth were killing people during this film. They’re just like each other except different M.O.’s, Beth kills with a pistol, Catherine with the ice pick. Nick told Beth Catherine knew things that only he had told her, she used Nielsen as the patsy as he had to die anyways being that he was on to her killing her husband and he knew she was cheating with another woman. Nick knows Catherine and Beth are playing games with him just like they did their professor and Beth’s dead husband. That’s why his so quiet after Gus and Beth check out.

My first time following your channel. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw you. Excellent analysis of my favorite film noir film. Keep up the good work.

This is my favorite noir. Absolutely brilliant film. I love the dialog between Walter and Phyllis and between Keyes and Walter. This movie ignited my interest in film noir.Another great one is 'Detour'.

catherine is a sociopath. this whole 'faling in love' business would and would never ever happen, but audience loves a happy, romantic ending, that is all there is to it. I am a diagnosed cluster b so before anyone tries to argue that it's possible for murderous sociopath to fall in love - please don't.

I originally watched this film for a criminology course, but I ended up really enjoying it. Watching this film analysis not only keeps the excitement alive but also deepens the conversation and understanding for me. This video was v enjoyable

Underrated analysis.

fantastic analysis, just watched this for the first time yesterday

Loved your video. Glory to God.

this is the best video i’ve found on close encounters. thank you!

I will always remember this film and the surprise ending when he left her at the gas station

6:50 uhhh Michael was still not a good person before the new heart. He was a womanizer.

Its all extremely advanced weapinized satanism.

Love Al Pacino ✔️

U K Water Industry in relation to Chinatown . They are dumping Sewage into the Rivers . They own the Rivers Corruption 2024 Style .

This movie was playing yesterday on TV in Spain while I was visiting the country, what a coincidence.

Bro! You amaze me. Great analysis

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 *¡AweSome!* 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | 8:26 am Pacific DayLight Savings Time on Saturday, 3 August 2024 leap year Common Era or C.E. formerly known as Anno Domini or A.D. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Awesome job and review! I enjoyed the book and the movie but man did I ever hate both Amy and Nick. 😅

The editing is fantastic and an excellent analysis, as always! Keep up the great work! Blessings and best wishes to you!

I think Cassidy more like «The Moneymaking Machine» Randy - then the Human Randy.

Brilliant analysis as always. But also a shout out to the video editing!

Yee Haw

I've seen this film about 100 times , always brings you back to covid

Fun fact: In an early screenplay, there was a character called Other HAL, who appeared during the deactivation and introduced himself "HAL's friend". He explains what the malfunction is, tells Dave about the secret mission, and highlights the complex emotional cocktail that formed HAL's progressively worsening mental imbalance. Among those emotions is "guilt, because of your faith in him, and because of his loyalty to you." He definitely felt guilty for the lies and his subconscious knew it, you are spot on there. I don't think the AE-35 error was deliberate, but rather a result of the unconscious desire to be cut off from mission control, who are monitoring his every action and acting as a conscience. Why would he purposefully create an impending failure only to put himself into a position where he is appearing to have made a serious mistake? Why, unless he genuinely thought something was wrong with the unit and is now frightened by the reality that he might be in error. He doesn't understand what's happening to him or why Dave and Frank, who had previously treated him as a trusted crewmate and friend, are turning on him now, literally going behind his back to plan his "murder" instead of sitting down with him to discuss it further like they would if they genuinely considered him their colleague. The malfunction that happened to HAL resembles paranoid schizophrenia, so I'm of the opinion that he *hallucinated* the AE-35 failure and was not consciously aware that there was nothing wrong with it. This could also explain the chess error, which is not very effective as a warning but could be an honest mistake. Neither source says it, but it would make sense if he was seeing, hearing, and sensing things that weren't really there. It is very interesting to think about his mental state; it's like he was split in two, one part knowing exactly what's going on but being unable to do anything about it, and the other not knowing what is wrong and desperately trying to pretend everything is fine. The existence of Other HAL in the early screenplay seems to support this; two halves of HAL, one that is emotional and begging for his life, and Other HAL, who is logical and knows he needs to be stopped. Other HAL tells Dave to finish deactivating him, trusting him to continue the mission. Speaking of Dave, I'm certain that if HAL really wanted Dave dead, he would be dead. With his complete control of the ship, there are quite a range of options for HAL to take in order to accomplish this, such as: - decompressing the bay and jettisoning Dave with no space suit/no way of propelling himself (he can open the pod bay door without prompting; he does so in the book, decompressing the entire ship and killing the hibernators that way, but Dave gets to an emergency oxygen closet and survives. Even so, HAL surely knew that closet was there and that Dave would have enough time to get to it.) - taking control of the pods, physically dragging Dave out into space with the mechanical arms, and leaving him there with no way of getting back - something as simple as using the pods to tear Dave into pieces - taking remote control of the pod once he was in it and sending Dave off into space never to return/decompressing the pod (although it is likely that the remote control function has to be manually turned on. In the book, Frank does so so HAL can help him see what he's doing with his headlights, but in the movie it's unclear.) - jettisoning Dave back out of the emergency airlock as soon as he has released the manual control holding it open, or simply refusing to open the door leading into the ship (although the sequel says that he does not have control of this airlock; - trapping Dave in a corridor by not opening the doors into the pod bay and the living area (although everything on the ship likely has a backup option for physically operating it in the event of computer failure) - if the murders were premeditated (which I don't believe they were), he could have quietly replaced the oxygen content in the ship with nitrogen until everyone passed out and died, solving his paradox in one fell swoop Dave, in fact, goes through the pod bay, the place with the most options for HAL to take, *twice*, the second time being on his way to the logic memory center. Nothing befalls him even though by all rights it should when this is HAL's last chance to save himself. You could call it plot armor, but the concept of Other HAL means it's more likely that HAL subconsciously *wanted* Dave to stop him. As for why he spares Dave and not the others, he seems to be closer to Dave over Frank platonically or even romantically, and he has no relationship with the hibernators at all. Dave is the one he trusts most, as evidenced by HAL's attempt to get him to understand that there are suspicious things about the mission. But because of the way HAL had to phrase it in order to even say anything, asking *Dave* if he feels that something is wrong instead of stating his own concerns plainly, Dave misunderstands and thinks that HAL is making a psychology report, as he is likely required to do once in a while. HAL, sounding unusually quiet, agrees and tries to play the whole thing off as silly, then immediately reports the AE-35 malfunction (which begs the question of if he wanted to try talking to Dave again, this time without mission control hanging over his shoulder). If Dave had begun to figure things out then, if he and Frank had gone to mission control and questioned them about the things HAL brought up and they debriefed them, then that would also solve the programming conflict and disaster could have been averted. HAL must have known what the solution to his problem was, but it would seem that he held off on actually carrying it out as long as he could, until a direct threat to the mission forced his hand. And in the end, Dave still cared for HAL and understood what happened to him, choosing to save him from the destruction of the Discovery and sharing his evolution with him, spending the rest of eternity together with their minds intertwined as Halman.

Excellent work, godfather