![The Godfather Of Cinema](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- Видео 201
- Просмотров 1 030 127
The Godfather Of Cinema
США
Добавлен 25 янв 2009
The Godfather Of Cinema. I analyze films of all genres including science fiction, action adventure, romantic comedies, classic horror, drama, Japanese anime, and black comedies.
ROCKY film analysis and Review. Still Best Boxing Film Ever And Still Undefeated!
ROCKY film analysis. Sylvester Stallone’s 1976 sports drama remains the best boxing film ever made about a leg-breaker named Rocky Balboa who gets a shot to fight Apollo Creed for the Heavyweight boxing championship of the world. I put this together for the fans of this great film
ROCKY (1976) is directed by John G. Avildsen and stars Sylvester Stallone as Italian Stallion Rocky Balboa, Talia Shire as Adrian, Burt Young as Paulie, Carl Weathers as Apollo Creed, Burgess Meredith as Mickey, Tony Burton as Duke, and ‘Smoking’ Joe Frasier as himself.
Chapters
0:00 intro
1:15 summary
5:45 analysis
8:30 film with soul
Thanks for watching my video and be sure to subscribe to The Godfather of Cinema: Mo...
ROCKY (1976) is directed by John G. Avildsen and stars Sylvester Stallone as Italian Stallion Rocky Balboa, Talia Shire as Adrian, Burt Young as Paulie, Carl Weathers as Apollo Creed, Burgess Meredith as Mickey, Tony Burton as Duke, and ‘Smoking’ Joe Frasier as himself.
Chapters
0:00 intro
1:15 summary
5:45 analysis
8:30 film with soul
Thanks for watching my video and be sure to subscribe to The Godfather of Cinema: Mo...
Просмотров: 159
Видео
A Clockwork Orange Analysis-Remote Controlled Morality?
Просмотров 1209 часов назад
A CLOCKWORK ORANGE film analysis. Did the Ludovico make Alex a remote controlled human? Is pain avoidance morality? Can we be good on our own? I’ll examine certain scenes from this dystopian classic in this video. A CLOCKWORK ORANGE is written and directed by Stanley Kubrick and based on Anthony Burgess’s 1962 novel of the same name. The film stars Malcolm McDowell as Alex DeLarge; Aubrey Morri...
GONE GIRL film analysis Part 1 | Amazing Amy, Nick And A Tale of Two Clichés
Просмотров 36821 день назад
GONE GIRL (2014). Amazing Amy plays on popular stereotypes to frame her husband for murder. Narratives, standards and assumptions are some of the areas of this film I’ll cover in this film analysis. Chapters 00:00 intro 01:24 bullshit artists 02:10 assumptions 05:06 belief systems 07:44 fit the narrative 09:23 show me state Gone Girl is a 2014 thriller directed by David Fincher, written by Gill...
DRIVE film analysis--The Car is The Monster, The Monster is The Man...AND VIOLENT!
Просмотров 63128 дней назад
DRIVE film analysis. “You give me a time and a place, I give you a five minute window. Anything happens in that five minutes, and I’m yours.” The Man is the Car, the car is the man Drive (2011) is directed by Nicolas Winding Refn, written by Hossein Amini and based on the 2005 novel of the same name by James Sallis. Drive stars Ryan Gosling as Driver, Carey Mulligan as Irene, Oscar Isaac as Sta...
The Thomas Crown Affair (1968) : Never Let Her See Your Hand! (film analysis)
Просмотров 560Месяц назад
The Thomas Crown Affair. Whether it’s chess, poker, war or love you should never show your hand. This is the theme I’ll explore in this film analysis. The Thomas Crown Affair is a 1968 heist film produced and directed by Norman Jewison, written by Alan Trustman and stars Steve McQueen as Thomas Crown, Faye Dunaway as Vicki Anderson, Paul Burke as Eddy Malone and Yaphet Kotto as Carl. Synopsis t...
film analysis FULL METAL JACKET, MAD MEN, AND EYES WIDE SHUT. Different films, same message.
Просмотров 434Месяц назад
film analysis FULL METAL JACKET, MAD MEN, AND EYES WIDE SHUT. Three very different films containing the same message FULL METAL JACKET, A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE, MAD MEN and consent: how rules and laws are determined by location FULL METAL JACKET is a 1987 Vietnam War film directed by Stanley Kubrick and cowrote with Gustav Hasford. The film is based on Hasford's 1979 novel The Short-Timers and...
Barry Lyndon film analysis Part 2-Messing Up Another Man’s Good Name in Style!
Просмотров 162Месяц назад
This analysis of BARRY LYNDON. How Barry Took a Good Name and Made it Bad The Duel scene explained. This is part 2 of my analysis of Irish commoner Redmond Barry and his search for an honorable name. Barry Lyndon is a 1975 period drama written and directed by Stanley Kubrick and based on William Makepeace Thakeray’s 1844 novel called The Luck of Barry Lyndon. The film stars Ryan O’Neal, Marisa ...
Barry Lyndon Part 1-Humble Beginnings of a Grifter and Commoner Named Redmond Barry
Просмотров 559Месяц назад
BARRY LYNDON. This analysis covers commoner Redmond Barry’s Beginnings as a defector and grifter in search of honor and a name. Barry Lyndon is a 1975 period drama written and directed by Stanley Kubrick and based on William Makepeace Thakeray’s 1844 novel called The Luck of Barry Lyndon. The film stars Ryan O’Neal, Marisa Berenson, Hardy Krüger and Leon Vitali. If you like the points I make in...
APOCALYPSE NOW REDUX-Colonel Kurtz is The Devil? Yes! A Different Angle
Просмотров 759Месяц назад
Apocalypse Now Redux-is Walter E. Kurtz the Devil? A different angle Apocalypse Now Redux is loosely based on Joseph Conrad’s 1899 novella Heart Of Darkness. Whereas Conrad’s novella is set in the Congo, Apocalypse Now Redux is set in the Vietnam War. Apocalypse Now Redux is a 1979 film directed by Francis Ford Coppola and co-written by Coppola and John Milius. The film stars Marlon Brando as C...
EX MACHINA analysis: S*x And The Power of Deceptive Images Explained
Просмотров 7712 месяца назад
EX MACHINA. The hot assistant uses s*x to make Caleb forget the difference between a human and a machine. Ex Machina is written and directed by Alex Garland and stars Alicia Vikander, Domhnall Gleason, and Oscar Isaac. I’ve included timestamps to jump to the chapter that interests you. 0:00 intro 0:37 summary 2:07 automatic art 3:29 empathy 4:09 exceptional 4:17 vanity 7:14 feel 8:08 s*xuality ...
TRUE LIES film analysis-A Double Life is Healthy?
Просмотров 1752 месяца назад
TRUE LIES (1994) A Double Life is Healthy? In True Lies, a super-spy named Harry Tasker lives a double life while struggling to maintain a marriage, raise a teenage daughter and save America from being nuked by terrorists. TRUE LIES is a 1994 action comedy written and directed by James Cameron who also directed the first 2 Terminator films, Aliens, Titanic and Avatar among other films. TRUE LIE...
Scenes From a Marriage--Explaining Ingmar Bergman's Best Film
Просмотров 1342 месяца назад
Scenes From a Marriage breaking down Ingmar Bergman's best film about relationships Chapters 0:00 intro 1:07 analysis 3:40 destruction 7:38 breaking free 10:17 murder of self 11:30 to thine own self 12:55 no sympathy A married Swedish couple named Johan and Marianne find their way to self-love by way of marriage and infidelity. Scenes from a Marriage is directed by Ingmar Bergman and stars Liv ...
The Fly--What Happens When You Combine Power and Insecurity
Просмотров 1002 месяца назад
The Fly is What Happens When You Combine Power and Insecurity. THE FLY (1986) is directed by David Cronenberg, co-written by Charles Edward Pogue and David Cronenberg and based on French-German writer George Langelaan’s short story of the same name published in the June 1957 issue of Playboy magazine. The Fly stars Jeff Goldblum as Seth Brundle, Geena Davis as Veronica Quaife, and John Getz as ...
In BIRDMAN (2014) Mike Shiner is Tyler Durden and Riggan is The Narrator and Here's Why
Просмотров 1462 месяца назад
BIRDMAN is FIGHT CLUB on Broadway. How I see this film Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) is a 2014 black comedy directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu that he co wrote with Nicolás Giacobone, Alexander Dinelaris Jr., and Armando Bó. The film stars Michael Keaton as Riggan Thomson and “Birdman", Zach Galifianakis, Edward Norton, Andrea Riseborough, Amy Ryan, Emma Stone, and Naomi ...
SE7EN (1995). Maybe John Doe Had a Point After All.
Просмотров 3393 месяца назад
SE7EN (1995). Maybe John Doe Had a Point After All. Chapters 0:00 intro 1:00 a nobody 3:15 strange 6:59 details 10:01 attrition 11:39 shock therapy 12:09 sledgehammer 13:16 fighter 13:48 get mad 15:02 wrath 15:42 did you know? Se7en is directed by David Fincher, written by Andrew Kevin Walker and stars Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman, Gwyneth Paltrow, R. Lee Ermey and Kevin Spacey. If you like this v...
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY: HAL Deliberately Caused The Antennae Failure and Here's Why!
Просмотров 5363 месяца назад
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY: HAL Deliberately Caused The Antennae Failure and Here's Why!
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY--The Dawn of the 'Second' Sentient Being in the Universe.
Просмотров 2763 месяца назад
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY The Dawn of the 'Second' Sentient Being in the Universe.
The Godfather Part II- What Michael Has In Common With Hussein and Gaddafi
Просмотров 6153 месяца назад
The Godfather Part II- What Michael Has In Common With Hussein and Gaddafi
The Matrix (1999)--Neo is a Metaphor of the Hebrew Slaves
Просмотров 4843 месяца назад
The Matrix (1999) Neo is a Metaphor of the Hebrew Slaves
THE GODFATHER (1972)-Michael Corleone and Sun Tzu's Art Of War
Просмотров 9424 месяца назад
THE GODFATHER (1972)-Michael Corleone and Sun Tzu's Art Of War
Dr Strangelove or the Art of Denying the "Essence"-Buck's Secretary and the Doomsday Device
Просмотров 3834 месяца назад
Dr Strangelove or the Art of Denying the "Essence"-Buck's Secretary and the Doomsday Device
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY film analysis: Connecting The Sleepers With Star Child
Просмотров 8004 месяца назад
2001 A SPACE ODYSSEY film analysis: Connecting The Sleepers With Star Child
Apocalypse Now analysis. How the Horrors of the Refugee Camp Changed Kurtz
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.5 месяцев назад
Apocalypse Now analysis. How the Horrors of the Refugee Camp Changed Kurtz
The Wrestler film analysis: It's About the Stripper, Not "The Ram"
Просмотров 2605 месяцев назад
The Wrestler film analysis: It's About the Stripper, Not "The Ram"
Blade Runner film analysis--What it Means to Be Human in an Inhuman World
Просмотров 3625 месяцев назад
Blade Runner film analysis What it Means to Be Human in an Inhuman World
PYGMALION | Eliza Doolittle Teaches Snobby Professor How to Be a Gentleman
Просмотров 836 месяцев назад
PYGMALION | Eliza Doolittle Teaches Snobby Professor How to Be a Gentleman
Apocalypse Now film analysis | Willard and Kurtz are the Same Person!
Просмотров 4706 месяцев назад
Apocalypse Now film analysis | Willard and Kurtz are the Same Person!
ON THE WATERFRONT-Boxing Symbolism and Joey’s Jacket Explained
Просмотров 1596 месяцев назад
ON THE WATERFRONT-Boxing Symbolism and Joey’s Jacket Explained
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND Explained | Why Nobody Could See Roy’s Vision
Просмотров 2,2 тыс.6 месяцев назад
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE THIRD KIND Explained | Why Nobody Could See Roy’s Vision
Pulp Fiction analysis | The Gold Watch Has a Lot to do With Butch Saving Marsellus
Просмотров 6957 месяцев назад
Pulp Fiction analysis | The Gold Watch Has a Lot to do With Butch Saving Marsellus
This video was tremendous, please do the rest of the series, yes even Rocky 5 thank you!
Thanks. Will do.
@@godfatherofcinema Thank you!
Amazing analysis
@@fernandomaron87 Mucho Gracias
@@godfatherofcinema You're the film critic who goes deeper in your analysis than anyone. I found out the channel by watching your 'Colonel Kurtz and the devil' incredible analogy and then watched almost all the videos. You make me want to rewatch every movie to look at them with a different perspective. Keep up with the amazing work!
My stepfather took me to see Rocky in the theatre when it first came out. What stood out to me as a kid was the raw eggs drinking scene. Stallone was a genius to come up with that great script. He definitely tapped into something universal. I wasn't so much a fan of the sequels. The character of Rocky is more interesting as a underdog.
@@nolagospeltracts8264 yeah I drank quite a few raw eggs after seeing that movie too lol he was my hero coming up and al I see hundreds maybe thousands of movies many much better. Rocky is still my favorite.
I like the first Rocky, it’s alright by me but it’s definitely not a favourite of mine, Raging Bull on the other hand, that’s my favourite boxing movie! If you haven’t seen it man in my opinion it absolutely blows Rocky away.
@@badassdanthepowerman6438 wait a minute you are talking to the godfather have I seen raging Bull are you kidding me? I didn’t say that Rocky was my favorite boxing movie i said it is my favorite movie. It is a sentimental thing, but I agree with you raging Bull is the best boxing movie ever in fact I made an old video on raging Bull some years ago
@@godfatherofcinema 😅 Haha of course you have what was I thinking?! Got you though, maybe I’m due for a Rocky rewatch after your review, it’s been a while! Have a good one man!
not really a fair comparison.
written in two days, yeah?
Yep. That's what the man said.
he might have had the raw draft in two days.
This must have been amazing to watch in the big screen, and most importantly the focus ain't about boxing but a story of love and perseverence. A cult classic.
It's a deep, complex movie....I like your Opinion....makes sense.....Strange how after the movie, Peter & Dennis lost their friendship....I read Peter's autobiography, "don't Tell dad"....it's a good book, he talks about many cool, hippy things...you can check it out at any library, i did...
Thanks. I agree, it is a deep movie that I resisted for decades thinking it was just a redneck movie about guys riding Harleys. Glad I got over that prejudice. One of the best decisions of my life.
I just don’t get why it ended like that you know? Like. All that just to die out in the middle of nowhere. I did like you take on the movie being about freedom though. I watched it for what it was and didn’t really start piecing that together until after the fact
It's subjective, I think. My opinion is that it represents the death of the 60s
Great lecture man! You gave me something more to explore about the movie. Also i always thought there was something odd about the position Kubrick puts the viewer in... in a way wants you to be the testimony of this grotesque theatre that is the human experience... and wants you to think deeply about the the things that in real life we take for granted by now. "Why is prison exist?" i mean what's the foundation of that thing, is good or evil really a concept that exist in nature? or it's just chaos and we HAVE to come up with this ideas to live together? and what's the consequence of this mechanic way of living for the human being? is morality a conditioned process we create or is it innate in us?... I thinks Kubrick's films makes you wonder about those questions, things about US that we buried in some part of our brain to believe that we are not beast anymore, it's seems like we removed from our consciuos mind some terrifying truths about the animals we are, in order to APPEAR less animals and be okay with the voice inside us, that is capable to do the worst things imaginable and unimaginable. The film contains soo many information united but detached from one other... that is almost like a puzzle. And what the film does internally to the charachters, externally is also conditioning us.... we watch those images and sounds projected and we get mixed feelings about it, the film costantly changes our perspective on the action that is shown... we are influenced by the Eye of Kubrick that forced us to stand with Alex, even if we don't supposed to (?) is the government violence's more brutal than the violence of Alex?... or we re just getting fooled by magic tricks of Cinema? (the ultimate Conditioning tool, used by Nazims, Fascism to to propaganda about their ideology) is the music? the personality of Alex that puts us behind him despite the atrocity he does?. Soo many questions and mistery with Kubrick.
@@lastanzadelcinema I think that that is what makes Kubrick so relevant and why is Movies still resonate even with this generation Of filmgoers
Both Catherine and Beth were killing people during this film. They’re just like each other except different M.O.’s, Beth kills with a pistol, Catherine with the ice pick. Nick told Beth Catherine knew things that only he had told her, she used Nielsen as the patsy as he had to die anyways being that he was on to her killing her husband and he knew she was cheating with another woman. Nick knows Catherine and Beth are playing games with him just like they did their professor and Beth’s dead husband. That’s why his so quiet after Gus and Beth check out.
@@Spooky_515 thanks for watching the video. I don’t know about Beth, though I think it was just Catherine.
My first time following your channel. I was pleasantly surprised when I saw you. Excellent analysis of my favorite film noir film. Keep up the good work.
much appreciated. glad you enjoyed the video
This is my favorite noir. Absolutely brilliant film. I love the dialog between Walter and Phyllis and between Keyes and Walter. This movie ignited my interest in film noir.Another great one is 'Detour'.
catherine is a sociopath. this whole 'faling in love' business would and would never ever happen, but audience loves a happy, romantic ending, that is all there is to it. I am a diagnosed cluster b so before anyone tries to argue that it's possible for murderous sociopath to fall in love - please don't.
I originally watched this film for a criminology course, but I ended up really enjoying it. Watching this film analysis not only keeps the excitement alive but also deepens the conversation and understanding for me. This video was v enjoyable
@@stevenkim9902 Much appreciated and welcome comment like you I love this movie thanks again and God bless
Underrated analysis.
fantastic analysis, just watched this for the first time yesterday
glad you liked the movie and this analysis. thanks.
Loved your video. Glory to God.
this is the best video i’ve found on close encounters. thank you!
much appreciated.
I will always remember this film and the surprise ending when he left her at the gas station
@@patriciafootejohnson2817 I agree it was pretty devastating, but I understand his point
6:50 uhhh Michael was still not a good person before the new heart. He was a womanizer.
thanks
Its all extremely advanced weapinized satanism.
Love Al Pacino ✔️
U K Water Industry in relation to Chinatown . They are dumping Sewage into the Rivers . They own the Rivers Corruption 2024 Style .
This movie was playing yesterday on TV in Spain while I was visiting the country, what a coincidence.
What did you think of the movie?
@@godfatherofcinema I wasn't able to watch it. The movie was ending when we found it on TV, so I decided not to watch it, since I like to see a movie from beginning to end in one go. Also the movie was dubbed in Spanish, which wouldn't be an issue since I'm portuguese and the two languages are similar, but still, I'd rather watch it in its original language.
Bro! You amaze me. Great analysis
Thanks. Much appreciated 🙏🏾
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 *¡AweSome!* 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 | 8:26 am Pacific DayLight Savings Time on Saturday, 3 August 2024 leap year Common Era or C.E. formerly known as Anno Domini or A.D. 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Much appreciated🙏🏾
Awesome job and review! I enjoyed the book and the movie but man did I ever hate both Amy and Nick. 😅
The editing is fantastic and an excellent analysis, as always! Keep up the great work! Blessings and best wishes to you!
I think Cassidy more like «The Moneymaking Machine» Randy - then the Human Randy.
Can you please analyze «Titanic» (1997) and «Avatar» (2009)?
Brilliant analysis as always. But also a shout out to the video editing!
much appreciated, jon!! Glad you liked it!
Yee Haw
I've seen this film about 100 times , always brings you back to covid
@@IbnZebbug That’s a great point I never considered
Fun fact: In an early screenplay, there was a character called Other HAL, who appeared during the deactivation and introduced himself "HAL's friend". He explains what the malfunction is, tells Dave about the secret mission, and highlights the complex emotional cocktail that formed HAL's progressively worsening mental imbalance. Among those emotions is "guilt, because of your faith in him, and because of his loyalty to you." He definitely felt guilty for the lies and his subconscious knew it, you are spot on there. I don't think the AE-35 error was deliberate, but rather a result of the unconscious desire to be cut off from mission control, who are monitoring his every action and acting as a conscience. Why would he purposefully create an impending failure only to put himself into a position where he is appearing to have made a serious mistake? Why, unless he genuinely thought something was wrong with the unit and is now frightened by the reality that he might be in error. He doesn't understand what's happening to him or why Dave and Frank, who had previously treated him as a trusted crewmate and friend, are turning on him now, literally going behind his back to plan his "murder" instead of sitting down with him to discuss it further like they would if they genuinely considered him their colleague. The malfunction that happened to HAL resembles paranoid schizophrenia, so I'm of the opinion that he *hallucinated* the AE-35 failure and was not consciously aware that there was nothing wrong with it. This could also explain the chess error, which is not very effective as a warning but could be an honest mistake. Neither source says it, but it would make sense if he was seeing, hearing, and sensing things that weren't really there. It is very interesting to think about his mental state; it's like he was split in two, one part knowing exactly what's going on but being unable to do anything about it, and the other not knowing what is wrong and desperately trying to pretend everything is fine. The existence of Other HAL in the early screenplay seems to support this; two halves of HAL, one that is emotional and begging for his life, and Other HAL, who is logical and knows he needs to be stopped. Other HAL tells Dave to finish deactivating him, trusting him to continue the mission. Speaking of Dave, I'm certain that if HAL really wanted Dave dead, he would be dead. With his complete control of the ship, there are quite a range of options for HAL to take in order to accomplish this, such as: - decompressing the bay and jettisoning Dave with no space suit/no way of propelling himself (he can open the pod bay door without prompting; he does so in the book, decompressing the entire ship and killing the hibernators that way, but Dave gets to an emergency oxygen closet and survives. Even so, HAL surely knew that closet was there and that Dave would have enough time to get to it.) - taking control of the pods, physically dragging Dave out into space with the mechanical arms, and leaving him there with no way of getting back - something as simple as using the pods to tear Dave into pieces - taking remote control of the pod once he was in it and sending Dave off into space never to return/decompressing the pod (although it is likely that the remote control function has to be manually turned on. In the book, Frank does so so HAL can help him see what he's doing with his headlights, but in the movie it's unclear.) - jettisoning Dave back out of the emergency airlock as soon as he has released the manual control holding it open, or simply refusing to open the door leading into the ship (although the sequel says that he does not have control of this airlock; - trapping Dave in a corridor by not opening the doors into the pod bay and the living area (although everything on the ship likely has a backup option for physically operating it in the event of computer failure) - if the murders were premeditated (which I don't believe they were), he could have quietly replaced the oxygen content in the ship with nitrogen until everyone passed out and died, solving his paradox in one fell swoop Dave, in fact, goes through the pod bay, the place with the most options for HAL to take, *twice*, the second time being on his way to the logic memory center. Nothing befalls him even though by all rights it should when this is HAL's last chance to save himself. You could call it plot armor, but the concept of Other HAL means it's more likely that HAL subconsciously *wanted* Dave to stop him. As for why he spares Dave and not the others, he seems to be closer to Dave over Frank platonically or even romantically, and he has no relationship with the hibernators at all. Dave is the one he trusts most, as evidenced by HAL's attempt to get him to understand that there are suspicious things about the mission. But because of the way HAL had to phrase it in order to even say anything, asking *Dave* if he feels that something is wrong instead of stating his own concerns plainly, Dave misunderstands and thinks that HAL is making a psychology report, as he is likely required to do once in a while. HAL, sounding unusually quiet, agrees and tries to play the whole thing off as silly, then immediately reports the AE-35 malfunction (which begs the question of if he wanted to try talking to Dave again, this time without mission control hanging over his shoulder). If Dave had begun to figure things out then, if he and Frank had gone to mission control and questioned them about the things HAL brought up and they debriefed them, then that would also solve the programming conflict and disaster could have been averted. HAL must have known what the solution to his problem was, but it would seem that he held off on actually carrying it out as long as he could, until a direct threat to the mission forced his hand. And in the end, Dave still cared for HAL and understood what happened to him, choosing to save him from the destruction of the Discovery and sharing his evolution with him, spending the rest of eternity together with their minds intertwined as Halman.
You make some great arguments against HAL deliberately breaking contact with Earth here none of which I can disagree with. There are just so many layers to this great film. I did read the early screenplay with Other Hal years ago but for this analysis I went off the latter script and Clarke's amazing novelization that I enjoyed even more than the film. Until recently, I didn't know that it's a part of a series of books. A co worker who's read them all told me. My analysis + the ideas you list here is why films this intelligent will always be far and few between. I could only wonder how Kubrick would have followed this film up.
@@godfatherofcinema Thank you! I have not finished reading the second book yet, but I picked up a lot of information from reading other people's analysis and screenshots of behind the scenes stuff. It's a truly great movie, and for me HAL 9000 is the character that makes me think the most about it. He might be a computer, but he's a very vivid reflection of humanity, and the relationship between him and Bowman, whatever that might be, is very interesting as well. One of the fun (and sometimes annoying) things about Space Odyssey media is that every book and movie have slight differences from each other that are accepted and not retconned at all. In one universe they went to Saturn and HAL decompresses the ship, in another universe they went to Jupiter and he locked Dave out of the ship instead. The movie does not override the book or vice versa, both are true. Even the early screenplay can be said to be canon, because the canon of Space Odyssey media is a bunch of parallel universes where things are slightly different.
Excellent work, godfather
@@RoundtreeattheGrosvernor thannk you